How Clinton and Trump affected their tickets
Heading into the 2016 presidential election, except for pockets of enthusiasm for either the billionaire populist or the potential first woman president, it was clear that
both major-party candidates were really unpopular. It was uncertain, though,
how down-ballot candidates would be affected. Would Republicans who
couldn't stand Trump and Democrats who couldn't stand Clinton stay
home and vote for no one, would they vote but split their tickets for
another party's presidential candidate, or would they be so repelled
by a party who would nominate such a person that they voted for most
or all of the other party's candidates? We now have most of the answers. While this post examines data from just Missouri, it probably tracks similar locales in other states.
The really bad news for Democrats is the extent to which disaffected Democrat voters stayed home. As much as progressive commentators complain about disloyal Democrats voting instead for Libertarian Gary Johnson, Green Jill Stein or a write-in candidate, those voters were at the polls to vote in down-ballot contests. The stay-home voter voted for no one. Both St. Louis and Kansas City logged about 10% fewer total votes
in 2016 than in 2012. The total suburban vote in St. Louis and
Jackson Counties also declined. These are Democrats' strongest areas. Elsewhere else in the
state, which is now mostly Republican, turnout was up.
It would be a mistake, however, to credit Trump (or blame Clinton) entirely for Republicans' ticket-wide success. While Trump ran 3 points ahead of Romney statewide, Republican
candidates for the five statewide offices on the ballot (excluding
the U.S. Senate race) surged an average 10 points ahead of their 2012
counterparts. These down-ballot results are partially explained by the respective situations of the down-ballot contests and the candidates
who ran. In 2012, popular incumbents (3 Democrat, 1 Republican) ran
in four of the five contests, but in 2016 all five
contests were open seats. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the
10-point statewide surge was probably somewhat influenced by the presidential vote.
The statewide comparisons, though, are necessarily averages of the entire state, where one area's movements in one direction are canceled out by another area's movement in the opposite direction. (I wrote earlier about pockets of Trump's appeal to blue-collar
Democrats and his repellent to upper-crust establishment
Republicans.) These areas produced a somewhat greater coattail effect. In
Trump's strong areas, the whole Republican ticket surged over 4 years
ago, but Trump still ran several points ahead of the ticket (but
still less than Reagan in 1984), leaving some potential Republican
votes on the table. In Clinton's pockets of strength in urban and
suburban areas (and Boone County, home of the University of
Missouri and the only
rural county Clinton carried), Trump declined compared to Romney, and the statewide
ticket's improvement was much less than in the rest of the state.
Details: In the rural and exurban counties, where Trump led the Republican ticket, the statewide ticket improved by nearly 13 points. But those areas also experienced more ticket splitting, as Trump led the ticket by 5½ points in rural counties and 4 points in exurban counties. The three white St. Louis County Townships where Trump improved over Romney also saw the state ticket improve by 5.8 - 9 points, which was better than in the rest of the county, and there wasn't much ticket splitting. Results were mixed in the city neighborhoods where Trump improved. The more Democratic areas had high ticket splitting and the state ticket improved in line with the rest of the city, but the state GOP ticket surged in "city limits precincts" in Wards 12, 23 and 24. In other urban and suburban areas and Boone County, where Trump trailed the rest of the Republican ticket by about 2½ points, the state candidates' improvement (4 points urban, 6 points in Boone County and 6½ points in the suburbs) was less than in areas where Trump did well. In the St. Louis County townships were Trump underperformed Romney the most, the statewide ticket's performance also improved the least (1.1% in Clayton Township and 1.6% in Hadley Township).
Isolated areas where the state Democratic ticket bucked the trend and improved over 2012 probably represent population changes such as white flight more than political trends. This was notable in downtown St. Louis and the Loft district, which have both experienced well-publicized increases in crime.
The big question has yet to play out. Will the Trump Democrats and NeverTrump Republicans undergo a permanent party change, or was 2016 just a one-time thing? The success or failure of the Trump presidency will have a lot to do with the answer.
What about voters of both parties who did show up but didn't vote for their party's presidential candidate? When comparing the presidential vote to that for the rest of the ticket, one needs to be mindful that a big gap means more ticket splitting and less benefit to the rest of the ticket (or less harm when the presidential candidate is tanking). Trump made little effort on behalf of the rest of ticket, much of whom
wanted nothing to do with him. Nevertheless,
most of the Trump surge also seemed to help the entire Republican
ticket. Statewide, Trump led the state-office ticket by just a little
over a point, and Republicans swept all statewide offices for the first time since 1928.
In the last big Republican win, Ronald Reagan won 60% of the Missouri vote in his 1984 re-election, a nearly 9-point improvement over 1980. The
Republican state-office ticket won 52.7% in 1984, a 6+ point improvement over
the prior election. But Reagan led the rest of the Missouri Republican ticket by
more than 7 points, and Democrats retained the open Lieutenant Governor's seat (and control of both houses of the state legislature). So, in spite of everything, Trump appears to have
helped his Republican ticket mates more than Reagan helped his.
Details: In the rural and exurban counties, where Trump led the Republican ticket, the statewide ticket improved by nearly 13 points. But those areas also experienced more ticket splitting, as Trump led the ticket by 5½ points in rural counties and 4 points in exurban counties. The three white St. Louis County Townships where Trump improved over Romney also saw the state ticket improve by 5.8 - 9 points, which was better than in the rest of the county, and there wasn't much ticket splitting. Results were mixed in the city neighborhoods where Trump improved. The more Democratic areas had high ticket splitting and the state ticket improved in line with the rest of the city, but the state GOP ticket surged in "city limits precincts" in Wards 12, 23 and 24. In other urban and suburban areas and Boone County, where Trump trailed the rest of the Republican ticket by about 2½ points, the state candidates' improvement (4 points urban, 6 points in Boone County and 6½ points in the suburbs) was less than in areas where Trump did well. In the St. Louis County townships were Trump underperformed Romney the most, the statewide ticket's performance also improved the least (1.1% in Clayton Township and 1.6% in Hadley Township).
Isolated areas where the state Democratic ticket bucked the trend and improved over 2012 probably represent population changes such as white flight more than political trends. This was notable in downtown St. Louis and the Loft district, which have both experienced well-publicized increases in crime.
The big question has yet to play out. Will the Trump Democrats and NeverTrump Republicans undergo a permanent party change, or was 2016 just a one-time thing? The success or failure of the Trump presidency will have a lot to do with the answer.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home